The letter sent to Garland by Trump’s lawyers is 100% meritless. The discovery in the case needs to be made public for the record. I don’t take such a hard view of Garland as many others do. Bringing such an unprecedented case involved a lot of I dotting and T crossing. There’s no way he wanted to come in less than 100% prepared. A lot o…
The letter sent to Garland by Trump’s lawyers is 100% meritless. The discovery in the case needs to be made public for the record. I don’t take such a hard view of Garland as many others do. Bringing such an unprecedented case involved a lot of I dotting and T crossing. There’s no way he wanted to come in less than 100% prepared. A lot of investigation needed to be done before a special prosecutor was assigned. Could the process have gone faster? Possibly, but nobody who wasn’t actually involved can really know.
Please. Witness how fast a special prosecutor was found for Hunter Biden. Garland can move quickly, when motivated. He assuredly wasn't motivated to prosecute the 1/6 traitors or Dump.
It also reads as though it was written by a 10year old! NO first-class attorney would sign their name to such a badly written and clearly not thought-out 'legal' argument (there isn't any in that entire letter). I'd BET frump dictated what he wanted them to say and so they assigned the lowest law clerk in their office to take the dictation and type it up.
The letter sent to Garland by Trump’s lawyers is 100% meritless. The discovery in the case needs to be made public for the record. I don’t take such a hard view of Garland as many others do. Bringing such an unprecedented case involved a lot of I dotting and T crossing. There’s no way he wanted to come in less than 100% prepared. A lot of investigation needed to be done before a special prosecutor was assigned. Could the process have gone faster? Possibly, but nobody who wasn’t actually involved can really know.
Please. Witness how fast a special prosecutor was found for Hunter Biden. Garland can move quickly, when motivated. He assuredly wasn't motivated to prosecute the 1/6 traitors or Dump.
It also reads as though it was written by a 10year old! NO first-class attorney would sign their name to such a badly written and clearly not thought-out 'legal' argument (there isn't any in that entire letter). I'd BET frump dictated what he wanted them to say and so they assigned the lowest law clerk in their office to take the dictation and type it up.