Obama Bucks Politics As Usual With New Carbon Limits That Are Welcome and Long Overdue

The Obama administration’s new EPA guidelines to cut carbon emissions from existing power plants should be applauded and the reaction from Republicans and some Democrats is more cynical politics as usual.

By 2030, the New EPA guidelines will:

 

– Cut carbon emission from the power sector by 30 percent nationwide below 2005 levels, which is equal to the emissions from powering more than half the homes in the United States for one year;

– Cut particle pollution, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur dioxide by more than 25 percent as a co-benefit;

– Avoid up to 6,600 premature deaths, up to 150,000 asthma attacks in children, and up to 490,000 missed work or school days—providing up to $93 billion in climate and public health benefits; and

– Shrink electricity bills roughly 8 percent by increasing energy efficiency and reducing demand in the electricity system

The point of new guidelines is to make coal based power plants run more efficiently. It is this new efficiency that has Republicans and coal state Democrats howling at the moon. Republicans by ideology go into convulsions anytime a new federal regulation is proposed, unless that regulation relates to what a woman can do with her own body, but conservatives and some Democrats are using the new guidelines to push the bogus coal industry propaganda of the war on coal.

Democratic candidate Alison Lundergan Grimes is trying to unseat Sen. Mitch McConnell, so she released a statement jumping on the “war on coal” bandwagon, “President Obama’s new EPA rule is more proof that Washington isn’t working for Kentucky. Coal keeps the lights on in the Commonwealth, providing a way for thousands of Kentuckians to put food on their tables. When I’m in the U.S. Senate, I will fiercely oppose the President’s attack on Kentucky’s coal industry because protecting our jobs will be my number one priority.”

The politics behind a statement such as this one from a red state Democrat are understandable. In the coal industry dependent red states, the war on coal is considered a gospel fact. The McConnell campaign is trying to define Grimes as an Obama puppet, so her political motivations are easily understood. She was trying to demonstrate her independence as a candidate while sticking up for a vital industry in her state.

The problem is that there is no Obama war on coal. The war on coal was waged by the natural gas industry. Obama isn’t harming the coal industry, but the flood of cheap natural gas is killing coal jobs. Ironically, the war on coal started under George W. Bush in 2004. This was when utility companies started to convert over to natural gas. Conservatives wanted to drill, baby drill, and the natural gas industry has done exactly that.

The politics of climate change in the United States have never been in touch with science and reality. The truth is that the administration is only seeking to reduce coal power plant emissions back to 2005 levels, and they are allowing the states to come up with their own plans to meet the 2030 goal.

This isn’t top down regulation coming from the federal government. It’s common sense.

The economic costs will be incredibly low, and the benefits will be high, “”Of course there will be costs, and costs of compliance, but overall for the economy the costs will not be very large, much less than 1 percent of gross domestic product,” said Robert Stavins, professor of business and government for Harvard University’s environmental economics program.

65% of Americans, and 52% of Republicans, support new regulations on coal power plants. President Obama took a historic step in dealing with climate change and pollution.

It is time for America to stop being held hostage by coal industry talking points, and do what is right for future generations.

Politics as usual suffered a defeat today, as President Obama led the nation past partisan talking points and into tomorrow.

Follow Me
Jason Easley

Jason is the managing editor. He is also a White House Press Pool and a Congressional correspondent for PoliticusUSA. Jason has a Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science. His graduate work focused on public policy, with a specialization in social reform movements. Awards and  Professional Memberships Member of the Society of Professional Journalists and The American Political Science Association

Recent Posts

Trump And House GOP’s Promise To Not Cut Social Security Is Total Nonsense

Trump got House Republicans to not use reconciliation to cut Social Security. The problem is…

6 days ago

Trump And Mike Johnson Agree To Apparently Cut Americans’ Healthcare To Pay For Tax Cuts For The Rich

President-elect Trump and Speaker Mike Johnson have agreed to a deal that would fund the…

6 days ago

Dozens Of Republicans Humiliate Trump/Musk By Voting Down CR

Donald Trump demanded that the debt limit be raised as part of the government funding…

1 week ago

Trump And Vance Blame Biden For Elon Musk Caused Chaos

Donald Trump and JD Vance are blaming President Biden for the havoc caused by Elon…

1 week ago

House Republicans Are Falling Apart And Now Mike Johnson Could Be Toast

The first little bit of pressure involving passing a bill to keep the government open…

1 week ago

Elon Musk Melts Down As House Republicans Show Him That He Has No Power

X boss Elon Musk is throwing a tantrum on his social media platform as House…

1 week ago